The Concept and Debate of Transhumanism

The Concept and Debate of Trans manismFaiza HossainIntroductionAs human worlds, we are obsessed with progressing and improving ourselves. Whether it be sensiblely or mentally, this thought of being give out is apparent. DS1Transhumanism is an extreme form of improving oneselfDS2. Whether it be being induced with artificial blood, or inserting a microchip into the brain, transhumanism is about devising the ordinary, extraordinary But, is it ethically right and beneficial to analyze on humankind? Should we be messing around with the natural creation of our bodies? And tar affirm transhumanism be a danger to society? These major ethical questions forget be answered in this inquiry paper, where the core value of what a transhuman is, will be exposedDS3.Is transhumanism truly beneficial and ethical for human beings?The definition of Transhumanism is the belief or opening that the human race can advance beyond its present physical and mental limitations, especially by the per sona of erudition and engineering.We are accompaniment in generation, where engine room is quickly evolving and improving. This advancement of technology has benefited stack, especially in the transhumanist area. This can be portrayed by the living example of Jesse Sullivan who is coroneted as the worlds first Bionic Man1. Sullivan lost his arm in an cerebrovascular accident however, The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, gave him the luck to replace his arms with robotic prosthetics. The procedure include connecting his nervous system to the robotic arm, cedeing him to lift objects by the power of thought. This procedure proves that the spousal relationship of technology and biological components is possible, and really is beneficial to mankind. An arm cant be grown, notwithstanding technology has given individuals a second chance and an opportunity to work a collapse quality of life.Another way in which machinery has positively changed a persons life is the story of a stroke patient who foot raceled the BrainGate2 System. A brain-computer interface drug abuse a 4mm-wide chip1, which was implanted in the brain. The importation of this chip was the ability to read signals from neurons which were in charge of motion imperative (e.g., the movement of muscles) and interpret the signals, using a computer, into the physical movement of, much(prenominal)(prenominal) as, a robotic arm and hand. After five years, the chip is still richly working, and the patient is able to carry out daily tasks, which we withstand given for, such as raising a cup of c come toee to her mouth. This surprise piece of technology has as well as given this patient a better quality of life, and notwithstandingmore, proves that the study of transhumanism is vital, to help those who privation it. Although a robotic arm whitethorn be coverd as artificial, and unnatural, technology is allowing people to be happier, tear raze after a traumatic event.The future of tra nshumanism includes the invention of artificial blood, which improves your stamina. Having a microchip inside your brain, which allows you to communicate telepathically, and being able to become smarter, passively, by storing information into this chip. The possibilities to the way the study of transhumanism can benefit us, is endless.Is human examination, justifiable?When it comes to the study of transhumanism, a controversial question always arises should scientist be allowed to test on human subjects? This concern is portrayed by numerous people (such as religious followers), and what some people claim, is holding scientists and technology back, from rapidly progressingDS4. look into involving human subjects is not intrinsically ethically dubious. military personnel testing does have ethical concerns, however, these concerns can be met and eased out. There is a huge importance for human testing as it will frame a huge improvement in the quality of lives and number of lives sal ve through such research 3, and this can be seen from earlier examples of patients receiving robotic arms. Human testing is vital for the progression of the future.When conducting experiments on human test subjects, it is necessary that the experiment is carried out ethically. This includes asking the histrions permission, to the full explaining what the procedure will be, do necessary medical check-ups, and fashioning sure he/she will be safe. Furthermore, external judgement is used to measure the safety of the experiment, and in this case, the Research ethics military commissions (RECs) are widely used to assess and review trial designs.4 The importance of these committees is to overview, and evaluate the practices the researcher will conduct on the participant. The committee include both professional and lay perspectives as to whether the research is ethically acceptable. This portrays that a sess of extensive background checks are carried out, and the safety of the parti cipant is a priorityDS5.PRECAUTIONARY VS PROACTIVE RESEARCHScientists, especially those in the transhumanism field, are aware of the cautionary and proactive research. We should not reject the products of applied science neither should we implement powerful new technologies without foresight and proactive preparation. (www.extropy.org)5. existence a proactive researcher, is about taking risks, but doing it for the benefit of making progress in technology. Relying on the evidence from past experiments, and written textual matter books, will not help transhumanism evolve into what it can be fully capable of. Making the robotic arms, was a proactive choice made by scientists, and now, people are reeking the benefits from this. Imagine, what more we can unveil, if scientists keep making this proactive choice.An alternative response for research is known as the preventive principle. The precautionary principle, proposed as a new guideline in environmental last making6, has four main mechanisms taking actions to prevent all uncertainties teddy the burden of proof to the proponents of an activity finding lots of alternative routes to perchance harmful actions, and getting more public participation in decision making before and during research. The precautionary principle highlights this tight, challenging linkage in the midst of science and policy.6 Although precautionary research is much safer for the participant, the problem with the unwillingness to take risks, means progress is made slower in the technology field. This slows down our advancement for a better future and means people who need these revolutionary machinery in their day to day life (such as robotic legs and arms), have to wait longerDS6.THE NEGATIVES ABOUT TRANSHUMANISM The main problem with the idea of transhumanism that legion(predicate) face, is if technology is being exploited for our selfish desires? The idea of wanting to live longer, or be smarter and stronger, are selfish desires th at people want to achieve, and some perceive as unnatural. As all living things are mortal, the study of transhumanism, is riveting a topic in transhumanism includes finding ways to cheat death. creation immortal sounds amazing, but is it realistic? If e trulyone in this world was immortal, then thither will be over population7, food shortages, increased global thaw and prohibit climate change. Furthermore, due to overpopulation, there may be a rapid spread of disease, water may run out and fogey fuel will be used up a lot quicker. The world we live in, cannot provide for the immortal.Transhumanist are optimist that through their technological findings, they can help ternion world countries such as India, by -skipping industrialization and go straight into late capitalist, post- industrial societies (Munkittrick). However, from the extremely high pollution levels seen by third world countries such as India and Brazil, this transition is not at smooth, and if anything, is more damaging to the earth. The concept of skipping industrialization, for these third world countries, seems very unrealistic, and nothing but a utopian view.One last negative attitude towards transhumanism, is that it will create a segregation surrounded by societies. It is evident, that when technology that can make you smarter or live longer is achieved, the privileged some will be able to have accesses to these traits, which will create and further distance amongst people based on their wealth. Although transhumanism will allow us to benefit traits which will benefit us in the future, it is also possible that there will be more inequality between people and also, earth is not equipped to allow living quadriceps for immortal living species.MY METHODOLOGYMy report is solely based off secondhand research. I have been able to carry out secondary research by reading and actively unpicking online journals and articles (based on transhumanism), visit ordained which profession transh umanist have written papers and pieces based on this topic. Furthermore, the use of critiquing text was used, and looking at real life examples of cyborgs was evident. As my research only consisted of secondary data, this meant that a research budget was not necessary, as I DS7was not required to do any primary research.TRANSHUMANISMA BETTER FUTURE?In conclusion, clearly the study of transhumanism has benefited people in this century. Technology is rapidly evolving and it is fitting the needs of people, whether that be the likes of a robotic arm. Transhumanism is interruption the boundary of people with disabilities, and in this context, closing the inequality gap that many disabled people feelDS8. However, if this research is mistreated, many people will get severely hurt, and it can totally flip, and instead, creates a larger inequality between peopleDS9. The future of transhumanism is looking bright, and with technology progressing this far, cures for diseases can be found much quicker, and ground breaking technology, can be used to help third world countries. It is the optimism of the people and scientist, which is needed, if we are to make the future a better place. I truly believe there is a place for transhumanism and cyborgs in the future, but it is up to us to be open minded for this change.REFERENCESDS10JESSE SULLIVAN Lanxon, Nate. pragmatical Transhumanism Five Living Cyborgs. WIRED UK. N.p., 2016. Web. 6 Sept. 2016.Transhumanist Values. Nickbostrom.com. N.p., 2016. Web. 6 Sept. 2016.Theconversation.com. N.p., 2016. Web. 7 Sept. 2016.Gorski, David. Theconversation.com. N.p., 2016. Web. 7 Sept. 2016.5. Transhumanisms Extropy Institute Transhumanism For A Better Future. Extropy.org. N.p., 2016. Web. 7 Sept. 2016.6. D Kriebel, M Stoto. The precautionary Principle In Environmental Science.. Environmental Health Perspectives 109.9 (2001) 871. Web. 7 Sept. 2016.7. The Problems With Transhumanism. psychology Today. N.p., 2016. Web. 7 Sept. 2016.DS1Th is is very bold statement. In the future, try to find any research that can support this claim.DS2This another example where you should use a reference to support the statement.DS3A lot of assumption were made in this paragraph. It will be a good practise in the future to the use a reference to support what you are saying.DS4Reference?DS5Good demonstration of ethical understanding, but the referencing format used was not Harvard referencing.DS6Good points laid out in this section.DS7Avoiding make-up academic report in first person, always write them in third person.DS8The context of this statement is not clear.DS9Which research, in what way will it flip, and what source do you have to support this statement?DS10The format used is not Harvard referencing.